|
Space
Jul 14, 2015 7:13:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 14, 2015 7:13:36 GMT
NEW HORIZONS AT PLUTO DAY!!!!!!!
10 years we've waited for this. When I think back what was doing ten years ago... my eldest hadn't even been born, only just got married, I hadn't even joined The Hub!
|
|
|
Space
Jul 14, 2015 11:41:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by The Doctor on Jul 14, 2015 11:41:15 GMT
In 10 mins we have a spacecraft flying by the planet Pluto!
-Ralph
|
|
|
Space
Jul 14, 2015 12:47:44 GMT
Post by legios on Jul 14, 2015 12:47:44 GMT
This is a wonderful day. Genuinely amazing stuff. I've been watching a bit of NASA TV over lunch, and it is fascinating looking at the first images from the flyby.
Karl
|
|
|
Space
Jul 14, 2015 14:10:38 GMT
Post by Philip Ayres on Jul 14, 2015 14:10:38 GMT
|
|
|
Space
Jul 14, 2015 17:57:25 GMT
via mobile
Post by The Doctor on Jul 14, 2015 17:57:25 GMT
Managed to catch the audio from the Nasa TV live countdown on my break. Catching up ow on the video of the last media briefing on NASA TV.
Very exciting stuff.
-Ralph
|
|
|
Space
Jul 14, 2015 18:09:22 GMT
Post by legios on Jul 14, 2015 18:09:22 GMT
I was fortunate in being home for a large part of the NASA briefing that was on over lunchtime, so I ended up watching it on my Ipad over my Spaghetti Bolognese. Really fantastic stuff, and some really sharp questions from the media folks who were there which was really nice to see. Even the greyscaled images they got back in the first downlink were really exciting. I'm really looking forward to seeing them get more colour data and the stereoscopic imagery to work with.
I've been thinking back today to one of my favourite University courses - the first year Astronomy module (as a BSc student I had a very unusual course makeup compared to the rest of the Psychology students)where both our lecturer and our textbook basically said about Pluto "We don't know very much at all. Maybe one day we will actually send a craft there and start to properly learn things" and now here we are, with the data streaming back. Great stuff!
I did have to laugh when one of the project team was explaining the data return rate though - the "very small data rate" that she was quoting - 40kbps on the high end and 10kpbs at the low end - was the kind of data rate I was getting from my first modem ten years ago... There is something amusing about the fact that New Horizons is sending back data at the kind of rates I used to get (on a good day) down my telephone lines ten years ago. I think that is pretty decent going for most of the way to the edge of the Sol System personally.
Karl
|
|
|
Space
Jul 14, 2015 23:53:41 GMT
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 14, 2015 23:53:41 GMT
Just got home from work and getting caught up. It's absolutely marvelous. I'm actually pretty moved. Little Pluto, revealed at last. All the hours I sat as a child reading my various space books....
|
|
|
Space
Jul 15, 2015 5:04:21 GMT
via mobile
Post by Toph on Jul 15, 2015 5:04:21 GMT
And off she goes into the long, lonely night, carrying with her the ashes of the man who discovered pluto. Follow where only Voyagers I and II have been before her.
But she does not go quietly! If all went well, she has so much data from her brief encounter, that it will take a full year to download it all back to earth.
New Horizons is kind of a sad story, that shows the pathetic decline of the american space program. She originated in the Nineties. The glory days when we had a budget surplus, under one of the most successful presidents we've ever had. The Nineties that gave us the unbridled success of the Mars Rovers, and the glories of Cassini. Yet, the window to reach Pluto was closing, and they could not get approval or funding.
FINALLY they got the go ahead in 2001. Probably just before 9/11, because I can't imagine this being approved post. 2015 is the year the window closes for a hundred years. They had just four years to design, build, and launch the probe, an endeavor that normally takes ten years, so they can hit their three month launch window in 2006 in order to reach Pluto in time by 2015, before it's gone forever (for us). This means that it had to be super light, in order to be the fastest thing we've ever sent (travelling up to a million miles a day), and they had no room to try anything new. They had to rely on stuff that was tried and true. They didn't have time to design a power source, and had to rely on plutonium (ironically). To keep the weight down, they couldn't shield the radiation, and radiation is bad for electronics. So to minimize the risk, they had to underpower it. Ther gave it only enough to generate 200 watts of power. So NH operates entirely on only enough electricity to power a couple lightbulbs.
As such, she has no mechanical parts. In order to contact home, the entire probe has to rotate and point the antenna towards earth. This is why there's a blackout period as she flies by pluto, because her cameras are on a different side. Because speed and weight were an issue, they couldn't have breaking thrusters (i'm speculating on this part, to be honest, i might be wrong. But i imagine the weight of the rockets and fuel would have slowed it down and missed Pluto), which is why the mission is just a flyby, instead of parking her perminantly in orbit, like Galileo and Cassini before her. When it came to launching... They almost basically just pointed her about where they thought Pluto SHOULD be. They weren't entirely sure it would be there, because when they launched, SO LITTLE WAS KNOWN about Pluto, they only had vague predictions of it's orbit.
Not to degrade the massive accomplishment that is New Horizons, I feel we almost completely dropped the ball. The decade that gave us three of the seven greatest exploration tools (I'm not sure if Curiosity began in the nineties or not), really let us down on this one. I can't help but wonder what we could do if NH had been a Cassini type probe. Had they been greenlit with enough time to clone Cassini and send it off.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 15, 2015 11:50:06 GMT
via mobile
Post by The Doctor on Jul 15, 2015 11:50:06 GMT
One of the greatest accomplishments in human history. Wonderful and astounding work by everyone involved. Looking forward to seeing what the team working on New Horizon learn over the next few years.
-Ralph
|
|
|
Space
Jul 15, 2015 16:03:30 GMT
via mobile
Benn likes this
Post by Fortmax2020 on Jul 15, 2015 16:03:30 GMT
The speed needed to get NH out to Pluto in any reasonable time frame meant there was no possibility of braking it enough to go into orbit around Pluto. This was entirely due to the physics involved and not any technical or economic skimping on NASAs part.
NASA continue to do great and amazing things and have massive cock ups and failures. As they have always done and always will do.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 9:24:40 GMT
Post by legios on Jul 16, 2015 9:24:40 GMT
I have to say that I remain amazed and astounded by what the New Horizons team have achieved. From a standing start they got a platform and a payload together in time to make the Jovian Gravity Assist window, got their spacecraft all the way to Pluto where it is doing fantastic science, with the strong probability of a KBO intercept to come and then who knows, maybe on towards the heliopause. It is a amazing achievement.
Karl
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 12:50:09 GMT
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 16, 2015 12:50:09 GMT
The pictures and information coming in are pure joy. A young surface in places?!?!
|
|
kayevcee
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
The Weather Wizard
Posts: 5,527
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 14:10:28 GMT
Post by kayevcee on Jul 16, 2015 14:10:28 GMT
Makes sense. It's a binary planet swinging around a moon a quarter of its size like a pair of country dancers. The gravitational effect they have on each other should be enough to cause a fair bit of vulcanism on both bodies. I wonder what a Plutonian volcano is like. Maybe they're like Triton, where cryovolcanoes make it rain ammonia snowflakes on an almost daily basis. Maybe they're like nothing we've ever seen.
Fun, innit?
-Nick
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 14:29:00 GMT
Post by Fortmax2020 on Jul 16, 2015 14:29:00 GMT
The Pluto-Charon system gravity isn't enough to cause vulcanism on either so it is (for now) a mystery what energy source is driving these changes. It's also possible that our calculations of impact frequency (and hence craters) in this part of the solar system are totally wrong, so the surfaces of Pluto and other KB objects may be virgin but ancient.
|
|
kayevcee
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
The Weather Wizard
Posts: 5,527
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 15:15:21 GMT
Post by kayevcee on Jul 16, 2015 15:15:21 GMT
Probably best if I stick to the aerosol chemistry, innit?
-Nick
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 15:50:26 GMT
Post by Fortmax2020 on Jul 16, 2015 15:50:26 GMT
There is still scope for you to use your Atmospheric Doctoring to model the transfer of Pluto's sublimed atmospheric ices to that red splotch on Charon. Get to it, soldier.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 16:25:47 GMT
Post by Benn on Jul 16, 2015 16:25:47 GMT
It's been a long time since I felt this much awe about something.
Now, can we get Pluto reinstated as a planet please?
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 17:03:59 GMT
Post by Fortmax2020 on Jul 16, 2015 17:03:59 GMT
That would be difficult since it has never not been a planet.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 17:30:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by The Doctor on Jul 16, 2015 17:30:08 GMT
I'm sure Ig-88 from Star Wars is behind everything.
-Ralph
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 18:37:55 GMT
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 16, 2015 18:37:55 GMT
Prowl controls IG-88. Like he controls everything.
Pluto a Planet.... Ooooohhhh.... I LOVE Pluto. As a child... the last planet in the books... mysterious... intriguing.... but, sorry, it's too small. Way too small. 25% the mass of the Moon is it? Can't be bothered to look it up, but I know it's something like that. Pluto, like Eris and others, are Dwarf Planets. It is the perfect classification for them. BUT, my beautiful Cyber-darlings, it does not mean they're any less interesting than a planet! Spank my arse, the Pluto fly-by has filled me with more wonder than anything since Voyager 2. Dwarf Planet is not a dirty word. Pluto is fascinating and vibrant and can teach us so much. But Pluto is not a Planet. It is a Dwarf Planet. Dwarf Planet and Proud. (and I want to go there)
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 18:48:51 GMT
Post by Philip Ayres on Jul 16, 2015 18:48:51 GMT
The dwarf planet debate is very much a live one again.
The term was only coined when Eris was discovered and estimated as bigger than Pluto but New Horizon's measurements of Pluto now make it larger than Eris!
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 18:50:21 GMT
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 16, 2015 18:50:21 GMT
But Eris is more dense, fascinatingly.
|
|
|
Post by Grand Moff Muffin on Jul 16, 2015 18:52:07 GMT
Pluto is a bazillion times older than the word 'planet'. Ancient celestial bodies are indifferent to how puny flesh creatures whose species didn't exist a 1/10000th of the solar system's lifetime ago choose to classify them. Space fans should focus on the reality of what's out there, not worry about how we label it.
Pluto is the size it is, whatever we call it.
Martin
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 18:58:41 GMT
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 16, 2015 18:58:41 GMT
I love you, Martin.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 19:00:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by Toph on Jul 16, 2015 19:00:31 GMT
What do we want?!? EQUAL REPRESENTATION FOR DWARF PLANETS!
When do we want it?!? Within a reasonable amount of time!
The problem with pluto as a planet is that there would have to be five new planets immidiately. With a thousand others then needing to be named, and seriously considered.
This would piss off most of the people pissed off at pluto's "demotion," because most of them only care about it because it's what they learned in the fifties. And five new planets (Eris, Ceres, Vesta, Sedna, and I forget the last) isn't how it always was, either.
Ceres was considered a planet when it was discovered. Before they knew about the asteroid belt. When they realized the belt existed, and that it was unlikely Ceres was an actual planet, it too was reclassified. And that pissed off a bunch of people back then, too. They had the exact same debates over Ceres that we have now, over pluto. Planetary science has no room for sentimentality. You operate under a set of facts generated by information available to you. When new information is available, you act accordingly, and change your facts. That's science. A dinosaur doesn't stop being a bird because we thought they were lizards in the fifties.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 19:09:50 GMT
Post by Fortmax2020 on Jul 16, 2015 19:09:50 GMT
All planets are planets, whether they are major, dwarf or minor. I don't see many of these Plutonians campaigning to make all dwarf or minor planets major. Gross hypocrisy! Strike them down.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 19:39:03 GMT
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 16, 2015 19:39:03 GMT
Your sexy white coat can only take you so far, sir!
There has to be a line, somewhere, otherwise you'll end up with, potentially, thousands of 'Planets'!
Planets are the 'Major' objects that orbit a Star, Dwarf Planets are the 'Minor' objects that orbit a Star. It makes sense. One needs order! (I need order)
But, as the beautiful Martin says, who are we to judge? Pluto, I love you and thank you for being part of my Solar System!
"Gonna take a lot to drag me away from you! More than a hundred men or more could ever do! I bless the rains down in Africa! (I bless the Nitrogen rain down in Pluto) Gonna take some time to do the things we never had! Oh oh"
....It felt like a Toto moment
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 20:00:17 GMT
Post by Benn on Jul 16, 2015 20:00:17 GMT
Wow. I did not expect this to lead to Toto. WHAT HAVE I DONE?
|
|
|
Post by Toph on Jul 16, 2015 20:03:43 GMT
You're not in Kansas anymore. Just like New Horizons.
|
|
|
Space
Jul 16, 2015 21:59:52 GMT
via mobile
Post by Shockprowl on Jul 16, 2015 21:59:52 GMT
Wow. I did not expect this to lead to Toto. WHAT HAVE I DONE? Everything.... leads to Toto.
|
|