|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 21, 2011 13:55:05 GMT
Which Action Master is, ironically, not powered by Nucleon?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Jan 21, 2011 15:02:43 GMT
Gutcruncher?
-Ralph
|
|
|
|
Post by Grand Moff Muffin on Jan 21, 2011 18:08:54 GMT
The Elite Action-Masters?
Optimus Prime in the Marvel comics?
Dunno.
Martin
|
|
|
|
Post by Shockprowl on Jan 21, 2011 20:59:47 GMT
Beats me, Gee.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dark Stranger on Jan 21, 2011 23:39:46 GMT
Any of the accessory companions? Or the Elite guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Benn on Jan 22, 2011 8:56:40 GMT
All of them! They are powered by elastic bands and the screams of children.
|
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 22, 2011 13:43:24 GMT
The answer is: Blaster's Flight-Pack.
According to his Tech Specs Bio, it's energon powered!
|
|
|
|
Post by blueshift on Jan 22, 2011 14:05:10 GMT
Why is that ironic?  |
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Jan 23, 2011 19:47:02 GMT
But...but a backpack is not an Action Master!
-Ralph
|
|
|
|
Post by Shockprowl on Jan 23, 2011 20:28:45 GMT
Is that the irony? I've never really understood irony.
|
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 9:45:40 GMT
Ironic that the point of Action Masters was that Transformers switched to using Nucleon, yet we have one here that still uses Energon.
Also ironic: Transformers that don't transform.
|
|
Nigel
Thunderjet
Posts: 4,967
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 24, 2011 10:30:30 GMT
Yes, but he isn't powered by it as the question posed.
|
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 10:40:19 GMT
According to Blaster's toy's Tech Specs Bio he is.
|
|
Nigel
Thunderjet
Posts: 4,967
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 24, 2011 10:46:59 GMT
No, his Tech Specs say that his Flight-Pack is powered by Energon. The Flight-Pack is his clip-on accessory.
|
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 10:52:39 GMT
Forgive me, Nigel, but I am somewhat at a loss as to the point you're trying to make.
|
|
Nigel
Thunderjet
Posts: 4,967
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 24, 2011 10:57:38 GMT
The point is, Blaster's backpack is powered by Energon, but he isn't.
The analogy would be to say that humans are powered by aviation fuel when in an aeroplane.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Jan 24, 2011 11:26:39 GMT
I feel I must agree with esteemed Nigel.
-Ralph
|
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 11:36:55 GMT
If you agree with Nigel, then please explain his point to me. I am still not getting it.
The question was: "Which Action Master is, ironically, not powered by Nucleon?" Answer: Blaster's Flight-Pack.
I am sorry for all the consternation the quiz has caused.
|
|
Nigel
Thunderjet
Posts: 4,967
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 24, 2011 11:40:08 GMT
It's as Ralph said earlier, a backpack is not an Actionmaster. A backpack is an Actionmaster's accessory, not the Actionmaster itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 11:43:37 GMT
Ah, I see now what you're getting at.
I had always thought of the Action Master partners as also being classed as Action Masters.
Still, these things can be open to numerous interpretations.
|
|
Nigel
Thunderjet
Posts: 4,967
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 24, 2011 11:46:43 GMT
I suspected that might be the issue.  (Let's put this to bed now and not raise the question of whether a backpack is a partner...) |
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 11:48:40 GMT
No, no. Carry on. It's clearly a very important issue for you and Ralph.
And besides, Flight-PackTM is no ordinary back-pack!
|
|
Nigel
Thunderjet
Posts: 4,967
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 24, 2011 12:01:04 GMT
Flight-Pack Tim sounds like a friend of Buzz Lightyear. |
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 12:03:13 GMT
Flight-Pack Tim sounds like a friend of Buzz Lightyear. Quick! Get that name copyrighted before Disney does! |
|
Nigel
Thunderjet
Posts: 4,967
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 24, 2011 12:18:32 GMT
To the Patent Office and beyond!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Jan 24, 2011 15:08:24 GMT
The Flight Packs are indeed not Action Masters. It would be like calling regular flavour Prime's blaster a Transformer.
I go now to have some (low fat) crisps.
-Ralph
|
|
|
|
Post by blueshift on Jan 24, 2011 15:12:53 GMT
The Flight Packs are indeed not Action Masters. It would be like calling regular flavour Prime's blaster a Transformer. I go now to have some (low fat) crisps. -Ralph Prime is a bad example, since Roller and his combat deck were also said in the tech spec to be part of his consciousness! Who's to say his gun wasn't too? |
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Jan 24, 2011 15:15:48 GMT
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
NO!
-Ralph
|
|
|
|
Post by grahamthomson on Jan 24, 2011 15:22:56 GMT
I put it that since Action Master partners which are named and trademarked (e.g. Turbo Board, Flight Pack, and Fistfight) and which can transform should be considered sentient beings worthy of the name Action Master as Transformers in their own right, as they are not mere guns to be fired then discarded like other weapons!
Equality for Action Master partneres now! Equality for all!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Jan 24, 2011 15:23:42 GMT
This thread has broke me.
-Ralph
|
|
(Let's put this to bed now and not raise the question of whether a backpack is a partner...)