|
Post by grahamthomson on Jun 25, 2009 7:15:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Benn on Jun 25, 2009 9:05:19 GMT
jeez, websites like that scare me. "a man and a woman hug, and the woman puts her head on his shoulder" and that's bad? PORNOGRAPHY I TELLS YE! sheesh, fuckwits.
|
|
Nigel
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
Posts: 5,098
|
Post by Nigel on Jun 25, 2009 9:52:21 GMT
I was going to comment on how absurd that is, but reading around the website, their hearts are in the right place. Have a look at their mission statement: www.kids-in-mind.com/help/about.htm . "The purpose of kids-in-mind.com is to provide parents and other adults with objective and complete information about a film's content so that they can decide, based on their own value system, whether they should watch a movie with or without their kids.... If one reads our reviews one will often find many instances where our descriptions are so detailed they seem absurd. But we'd rather err on the side of comprehensiveness. It's up to parents to decide which details are useful to them and their family, and which ones they consider fatuous." Fair enough. The problem is, it's all so out of context that it's no longer possible to make an objective decision based on the information. The Sex/Nudity section makes it sound like a frat party film, something like Animal House, Porkies or American Pie. Half of this stuff would go straight over a child's head. "A woman is sprayed in the face with an unnamed, thick yellow substance (semen is implied but there is no sexual activity)." No, to a child it is what it is, gunk. "A robot is shown breaking through the hull of a satellite." Don't try this at home, kids! Oh, by the way: spoiler warning!
|
|