|
Post by Philip Ayres on Nov 14, 2007 14:01:34 GMT
Series 1 DVD out Monday ! Cheapest I've found is £39 from ASDA.
Missed loads of these the first time due to Jonathan arriving !
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Nov 14, 2007 14:33:14 GMT
In a shocking display of incredible awesomeness, my Missus bought the single discs as they were released. Imagine my rapture!
|
|
|
Post by Andy Turnbull on Nov 14, 2007 15:33:09 GMT
Torchwood was a maddening series that had some cracking episodes but let down when it tried to be "edgy" and "adult" and ended up coming off as a bit childish.
John Barrowman was excellent throughout the series though.
Andy
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Nov 14, 2007 16:23:18 GMT
J.B is a legend, in every sense of the word. I do agree about the 'adult' parts, they always make me laugh. It's like they're trying so hard to show how mature the show is, when they've got this half girl/half cyberman hybrid romping around in the basement.
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Nov 14, 2007 17:52:56 GMT
I find any residual interest in this has been killed by the long gap between series. Season 1 finished 11 months ago!
JB is awesome though!
-Ralph
|
|
|
Post by Grand Moff Muffin on Nov 14, 2007 18:09:00 GMT
However annoying all the characters in it are (Jack excepted), I feel it only prudent to follow the one media outlet which warns me which streets not to walk down in my home city.
Martin
|
|
|
Post by legios on Nov 14, 2007 19:54:33 GMT
Torchwood struck me as a show desperately uncertain of its identity. It was sold to the audience as "moody and adult", which too often seemed to boil down to "everybody scowls a lot, and we have a strongly adolescent streak". The first season pretty much served up something like six different takes on the general concept - none of which felt entirely like the same series. Some of the cast were decent - John Barrowman was always watchable despite the very inconsistent way his character was written - and some were less so (or so poorly served by the material it is impossible to tell whether they would have been any good).
A few episodes I quite enjoyed The opener that managed to take in some quite grim material and the more whimisical moments of "oh yeah, we have a pterodactyl. He's kind of a pet" seemed like the setup for a completely different show to any of the following episodes. But in general I found "Torchwood" struck out with me more often than it connected. And watching the last three episodes I found that I got steadily more bored and less interested with every passing minute.
I'm honestly not sure at this moment that I have any interest in watching any of Season 2 when it finally emerges.
Karl
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Nov 14, 2007 21:35:06 GMT
I know what you mean. I finally broke free of Who-completist urges when I only watched episode 1 of Sarah Jane Adventures. Haven't been motivated to watch/download any more of that.
-Ralph
|
|
|
Post by Shockprowl on Nov 15, 2007 12:42:57 GMT
I enjoyed Tourchwood, but I agree with what many of you are saying about it not quite sorting itself out in regards to what it wants ot be. I think that'll be something that improves with time. And yes J.B. is cool!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2007 18:22:59 GMT
I havn't exactly watched an episode of Torchwood but I did once mention the series to a workmate who is a massive fan of Doctor Who and he initially didn't believe me when I said that the name 'Torchwood' is an anagram of 'Doctor Who'.
|
|
kayevcee
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
The Weather Wizard
Posts: 5,527
|
Post by kayevcee on Nov 18, 2007 23:10:07 GMT
Ohhh yeah.
-Nick
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Nov 20, 2007 7:24:00 GMT
I think series two should be a lot more solid, now that they've established the characters and have a general direction to steer the show in. They've settled into their groove a little.
Although we still need more 1940's romance episodes.
|
|
Nigel
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
Posts: 5,094
|
Post by Nigel on Nov 23, 2007 14:45:05 GMT
I am reliably informed (from Mam, who was watching a John Barrowman interview) that Torchwood returns to our screens in January.
I don't know when Who is back on but I would speculate that the schedules are intended to create a smoother transition as Freema switched between series.
|
|
|
Post by Philip Ayres on Nov 23, 2007 16:47:30 GMT
Been known for a while. And not just freema by all accounts.
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Nov 27, 2007 8:05:37 GMT
Straight from the mouth of Barrowman yesterday: We just finished up last wednesday, It'll be back in January, bitches!
|
|
Hero
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
King of RULES!
Everything Rules
Posts: 7,487
|
Post by Hero on Jan 5, 2008 18:22:41 GMT
New series starting soon.
===KEN
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Jan 5, 2008 18:34:03 GMT
Yaldy! I cannot wait for more Torchwood action.
|
|
|
Post by Philip Ayres on Jan 10, 2008 11:05:35 GMT
Wednesday 15th @ 9pm BBC2
|
|
|
Post by Grand Moff Muffin on Jan 10, 2008 19:04:33 GMT
From what I read in the Radio Times, they've taken a lot of criticism on board from the last series. The characters will now (apparently) be more likeable, and Cap'n Jack more like he was in season one of Doctor Who. And it will no longer be so adult-oriented that they can't broadcast an edited version for the kids at 7pm the following week.
Martin
|
|
Hero
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
King of RULES!
Everything Rules
Posts: 7,487
|
Post by Hero on Jan 14, 2008 0:46:45 GMT
So no 'agenda' basically?
|
|
|
Post by The Doctor on Jan 14, 2008 10:36:53 GMT
Usually, I would question a break of over 12 months between series (especially when a show is new) but in this case if there has been some significant re-tooling (which the change of channel and pre-watershed editions being produced) then I can see the point of a long gap. We shall see.
-Ralph
|
|
|
Post by legios on Jan 14, 2008 12:40:47 GMT
So no 'agenda' basically? I'm not sure the first season of "Torchwood" could have been described as having an agenda. It hadn't sufficiently gotten its act together to really know what it was trying to say, which would have made if difficult to have an agenda really. Haven't decided yet if I will watch Season 2. It's on BBC 2 so the chance of me getting decent audio on it is a bit dicey at the moment, and the picture quality is at best going to be adequate. I shall see how I feel on Wednesday I guess. Karl
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Jan 14, 2008 13:10:05 GMT
I'll watch it for Jay-Bee, as well as occasional plot-enjoyment.
|
|
|
Post by Philip Ayres on Jan 16, 2008 8:27:40 GMT
TODAY
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Jan 16, 2008 21:51:21 GMT
Okay, so Jay-Bee kissed everyone.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Andy Turnbull on Jan 16, 2008 21:58:45 GMT
It was a solid opener which was far less juvenile than it's BBC3 incarnation. The story was nothing spectacular but made up for it with a lot of good performances. JB of course was top notch.
I absolutely detested the "Bloody Torchwood" joke before the title sequence - lazy writing of the highest order.
More shadowy hints of Jack's past and the way they touched on his appearances in Who were vague enough to keep the two series distinct.
I'm hopeful this series will be more palatable as a whole than the first, but something tells me we might not get anything on a par with They Keep Killing Susie.
Andy
|
|
|
Post by legios on Jan 16, 2008 22:28:00 GMT
Thoughts about Torchwood... Hmm, ok then.
Firstly, pick a tone and stick to it. Their attempts to seque back and forth between different tones didn't really work for me at all. It felt like they had to come to a stop every time they changed gears. They haven't quite mastered the art of switching tones on the fly it seems.
I also did think it veered a bit into the adolescent again in places. But nowhere near as badly as last season though so that is an improvement.
I'd agree that the story itself was fairly thin - and pretty predictable really. I doubt there were many of us who didn't see a lot of the main beats coming. Fortunately the cast did a decent job with it - even James Marsters who I wasn't really expecting a great deal from to be honest.
The joke at the end of the pre-credits sequence made me groan audibly. A shame really, because they would have got a better effect if they had cut it off at "Excuse me, did you see a Blowfish in a Sports Car?"
I didn't think it was too bad as a season opener - not stellar but better than most of the previous batch of episodes, but then the opener for the first season wasn't too bad. I'll reserve judgement for the moment - I'm not expecting them to serve up something on a level with "They Keep Killing Suzie", but if they can maintain the level they've found for this episode they will be ahead of where they were last time around.
Karl
|
|
Gav
Drone
John Travoltage!
Posts: 2,047
|
Post by Gav on Jan 16, 2008 22:42:47 GMT
Man i was hoping the fish dude turned out to be INJEKTOR....
Well we can dream...
|
|
|
Post by Grand Moff Muffin on Jan 17, 2008 7:52:21 GMT
I was greatly relieved. The thing about season one I most wanted them to fix was the likeability of the characters. They managed to go easy on the in-fighting, and even Owen wasn't particularly annoying. I just hope they stick to that. And James Marsters was a plus. He played the reaction to Jack coming back to life quite well. I trust they will never make the mistake of putting a chip in Captain John that makes him unable to hit anything and he becomes one of the good guys...
On the whole, it was a lot better than the Doctor Who Christmas special. "Bloody Torchwood" made me cringe, but not as much as the Queen waving or all those slow falls to death. The stopping at the pelican crossing bit redeemed it somewhat.
Martin
|
|
Nigel
Fusilateral Quintro Combiner
Posts: 5,094
|
Post by Nigel on Jan 17, 2008 10:21:34 GMT
I absolutely detested the "Bloody Torchwood" joke before the title sequence - lazy writing of the highest order. I couldn't disagree more. Putting aside the fact that it made me laugh, it says volumes in just two words. Torchwood, previously a secret(ive) organisation is now common knowledge; not only is the organisation known about but there also appears to be animosity towards it. I may be reading too much into it here, or maybe it is too early in the season to judge, but perhaps a part of that animosity, since the existence of aliens is now also common knowledge, is that Torchwood (in today's media-saturated society) provides an easy target on which to level blame for the alien invasions; an underlying theme that fits in with the scared, deserted London of Who's Voyage of the Damned. Overall, a strong start to the season, I thought; they seem to have taken some of the criticisms on board. I enjoyed Marsters' performance, but he was really just playing a version of Spike, wasn't he? Please don't talk too much about the "coming soon" segment; I switched off for spoiler purposes.
|
|